yusu77
18-09-2008, 11:21 PM
that's the theory of the great psychological Freud, who was the first to use psychoanalysis in his research.
he ask the following question:
Do we all want to kill our father and sleep with our mother? The little girl hates Does necessarily his mother, loves and she jealously his father? Is that always necessarily the case?
any naming his theory on the problem of Oedipus (who was near the Greek myth for those who want to know t this story here is the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus_the_King)
It is surprising to note that despite the liberalization of morals this theory continues to shock. Without doubt it is still a little young, since it dates from the beginning of the 20 th century , and it is often an idea takes time before being accepted. But why should we accept? Is this really the truth?
This idea shocking because it reveals attractions contrary to those who are socially acceptable. Incest can only be guilty of an abnormal and social point of view, since it negates the principle of society: the love within the family breaks the social bond, removes the meeting and prevents the formation larger units. Thus spoke there of family: love, family isolation, when the social bond together and expands.
But this love is all too visible, and you have to be blind to ignore. Patent in children, adult taboo. The family are sexual preferences, nothing is more obvious, but why would they be sexual? Perhaps this is what we hereby: tenderness that is sexual, that erotic love is that the passion is still lecherous.
Freud actually believe that all pleasures belong to the same family, hence the idea of sexuality family. Whatever the objects, the surge is the same, greed common mechanism repetitive an internal tension, calmed by an external stimulation, stroke or writing, painting or possession…
And it is in the family that created the first pleasures. The other Freud's idea is to show that we do not condemn all this sentiment, if we do not feel so strongly. There is no taboo without desire, not without moral impulses, no law without violent transgressions. Because this desire is there that we forbid.
he ask the following question:
Do we all want to kill our father and sleep with our mother? The little girl hates Does necessarily his mother, loves and she jealously his father? Is that always necessarily the case?
any naming his theory on the problem of Oedipus (who was near the Greek myth for those who want to know t this story here is the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus_the_King)
It is surprising to note that despite the liberalization of morals this theory continues to shock. Without doubt it is still a little young, since it dates from the beginning of the 20 th century , and it is often an idea takes time before being accepted. But why should we accept? Is this really the truth?
This idea shocking because it reveals attractions contrary to those who are socially acceptable. Incest can only be guilty of an abnormal and social point of view, since it negates the principle of society: the love within the family breaks the social bond, removes the meeting and prevents the formation larger units. Thus spoke there of family: love, family isolation, when the social bond together and expands.
But this love is all too visible, and you have to be blind to ignore. Patent in children, adult taboo. The family are sexual preferences, nothing is more obvious, but why would they be sexual? Perhaps this is what we hereby: tenderness that is sexual, that erotic love is that the passion is still lecherous.
Freud actually believe that all pleasures belong to the same family, hence the idea of sexuality family. Whatever the objects, the surge is the same, greed common mechanism repetitive an internal tension, calmed by an external stimulation, stroke or writing, painting or possession…
And it is in the family that created the first pleasures. The other Freud's idea is to show that we do not condemn all this sentiment, if we do not feel so strongly. There is no taboo without desire, not without moral impulses, no law without violent transgressions. Because this desire is there that we forbid.