PDA

View Full Version : Avatar: Some Personal Comments


RonPrice
01-03-2010, 02:25 AM
AVATAR

The film Avatar has finally been released this month after being in development since 1994. I have not seen it yet, but I have read about it and discussed it with several people who have. This prose-poem tries to encapsulate some of my initial thoughts on this blockbuster, its initial reception and some of its meaning.

James Cameron, who wrote, produced and directed the film, stated in an interview that an avatar is: “an incarnation of one of the Hindu gods taking a flesh form." In this film, though, avatar has more to do with human technology in the future being capable of injecting a human's intelligence into a remotely located body, a biological body. "It's not an avatar in the sense of just existing as ones and zeroes in cyberspace,” said Cameron; “it's actually a physical body." The great student of myth, Joseph Campbell(1), should have been at the premier in London on 10 December 2009. I wonder what he would have said.

Composer James Horner scored the film, his third collaboration with Cameron after Aliens and Titanic. A field guide of 224 pages for the film's fictional setting of the planet of Pandora was released by Harper Entertainment just five weeks ago. The guide was entitled Avatar: A Confidential Report on the Biological and Social History of Pandora. With an estimated $310 million to produce and $150 million for marketing, the film has already generated positive reviews from film critics. Roger Ebert, one of the more prestigious of film critics, wrote: “An extraordinary film: Avatar is not simply sensational entertainment, although it is that. It's a technical breakthrough."-Ron Price with thanks to Wikipedia, 30 December 2009.

Like viewing Star Wars back in ’77
some said/an obvious script with an
earnestness & corniness/part of what
makes it absorbing/said another/Gives
you a world, a place/worth visiting/eh?
Alive with action and a soundtrack that
pops with robust sci-fi shoot-'em-ups...

A mild critique of American militarism
and industrialism.....yes the military are
pure evil........the Pandoran tribespeople
are nature-loving, eco-harmonious, wise
Braveheart smurf warriors. Received....
nominations for the Critics' Choice Awards
of the Broadcast Film Critics Association &
on and on go the recommendations for the..
best this and that and everything else. What
do you think of all this Joseph Campbell???
You said we all have to work our own myth(1)
in our pentapolar, multicultural-dimensional
world with endless phantoms of our wrongly
informed imagination, with our tangled fears,
our pundits of error, ill-equipped to interpret
the social commotion tearing our world apart
and at play on planetizing-globalizing Earth.(2)

(1)Google Joseph Campbell for some contemporary insights into the individualized myth we all have to work out in our postmodern world.
(2)The Prophet-Founder of the Bahá'í Faith, Bahá'u'lláh, has been presented as an avatar in India beginning, arguably, in the 1960s. With only 1000 Baha’is in India in 1960 to more than 2 million by the year 2010. Baha’u’llah has been associated with the kalkin avatar who, according to a major Hindu holy text, will appear at the end of the kali yuga, one of the four main stages of history, for the purpose of reestablishing an era of righteousness. There are many examples of what one might call a quasi-cross-cultural messianistic approach to Bahá'í teaching in India.

This approach has included: (a) emphasizing the figures of Buddha and Krishna as past Manifestations of God or avatars; (b) making references to Hindu scriptures such as the Bhagavad Gita, (c) the substitution of Sanskrit-based terminology for Arabic and Persian where possible; for example, Bhagavan Baha for Bahá'u'lláh, (d) the incorporation in both song and literature of Hindu holy spots, hero-figures and poetic images and (e) using heavily Sanskritized-Hindi translations of Baha'i scriptures and prayers.

Ron Price

YoungLady
02-09-2010, 05:16 PM
Umm that was a lot to read;) I read the first few paragraphs of it. I watched the film when it came out and the version with additional scenes that has just been released and I think it is okay. It would be good if it wasn't so long. I was bored by the end of it. I thought that the avatars was a great idea (I didn't know about the Hindu god thing. That's pretty cool) and the plot was really good. Like I said before, it was a little too long for my tastes.

tsu-bastet
02-09-2010, 11:56 PM
i thoroughly enjoyed this..a great movie-loved the special fx!
..and even better - it kept my son glued to his seat for its entirety- wins my vote any day!!!
lol!
:)

smorzando
03-09-2010, 11:41 AM
Went on for a lil too long -- if a film's any longer than about two hours it starts to lose my attention even if it's really good -- too much like pocahontas for my liking, but I have to admit, it was a good film.

tsu-bastet
03-09-2010, 11:51 AM
lol!!
so agree with the pocahontas comment smorz!!
:)

danecobain
03-09-2010, 05:48 PM
I think the same, it was too long and too boring, and too much like pocahontas in a different hue. I also didn't think the graphics were as great as they were made out to be - they were good, but not that much better than the graphics that we're already used to these days

Alia'a
05-09-2010, 06:40 PM
It reminded me of a film I saw when I was a kid called FERNE GULLEY. In fact, i would go as far to say that AVATAR is almost an exact replica of ferne gulley except will aliens instead of fairies and goes into a bit more detail with the religion... and of course, the special effects.

In my opinion, AVATAR is not good because of its storyline, that storyline has been done a thousand times before. The thing they hope to make their money on was the graphics/special effects/3Dness in the film, and by the looks of it successful. But the storyline is nothing special or new.

I went to see it at the cinema, i enjoyed the graphics and 3D but i wouldnt buy it on DVD

RonPrice
06-09-2010, 06:32 AM
Thanks for all those responses, folks, to my post of several months ago. As in all films, everyone has their own reactions. At least some few people saw my prose-poem here. When one writes one likes to know there are readers. it is a bit like talking and having someone who listens.-Ron

gabquotesl
22-11-2010, 08:57 AM
avatar is cool becuase of the 3d effects. the plot is pretty much old and well known

Radrook
29-06-2011, 11:39 PM
I liked everything about Avatar but was most impressed by the scenery and realistic aliens.
Only one scene was off and that was when they showed the blue woman shooting arrows at the ships. Her neck was way too long in that scene. Loved those flying dragon-like creatures. Can't tell where the riders anchored their legs though. Found the conclusion
where they say "I see you!" fantastic as were previous fight scenes. An explanation on how those mountains defied gravity would hve been apreciated. All in all a great film.

IMHO of course.

Heamus Seaney
09-01-2012, 12:05 PM
I thought Avatar was a cool movie but not a great. Critically I think it was a victim of its own hype. It failed to live up to the massive billing that the pr guys created before its release.

That said, however, the aesthetic was still very cool. For me it was more about the aesthetics than the narrative. It was a film built for the re-launch of 3D cinema. The plot is borrowed and forumlaeic but then I'd imagine the same can be said for a good 90% of films produced. The plot of Black Swan openly replicates that of the opera "Swan Lake" but that doesn't detract from the film's quality.

Although Avatar was a good film I am glad that The Hurt Locker won at the academy awards. A much lower budget and simply a better film. Beautifully shot and a great subtext between the two films!